13
Reasons Why article: https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/08/13-reasons-why-demonstrates-cultures-power/535518/
Second-order
Knowledge Claims:
1.
That
people’s thoughts can be accurately known by what they google (the article speculates
that the show causes more people to consider suicide due to the rise in
searches for ‘how to kill yourself’ for example).
2.
People
are inspired and/or influenced in major life decisions (in this case, suicide)
by what they observe in media (the suicide scene in 13 Reasons Why).
3.
Graphical
depictions of an action affect humans’ psychology more than
implied/non-graphical depictions.
Knowledge
Question: To what extent is data gathered from search engines on particular
keywords an accurate reflection of what people are considering as valid
actions?
Search engines are something we use every
day, for the most mundane things, like ‘how many m&ms are in a 250-gram bag
of m&ms?’, to the most urgent things, like ‘is my cough actually cancer’.
However, how accurate is our search history at determining what kind of person
are we? On one hand, we could argue that what we search can be a reflection of our
self; revealing the media we consume, our background, our knowledge, etc., by
speculating what prompted us to search in the first place. Relating this to 13
Reasons Why, it is possible that a depressed teenager may view the show, and be
inspired and start searching up methods of suicide. However, at the same time,
another person may simply have a curiosity in the subject (a bit morbid – but not
unprecedented). With this real-life situation, both answers to this question
can be argued for; the show brought the topic of suicide into discussion, whether
that inspires people to take action is another story and question, however, it
brings the topic to the viewers mind. But there is another aspect to consider
with this RLS: Can it be said, with certainty, that the rise in searches
related to suicide were a direct result of 13 Reasons Why? Yes, the study did
look at a time period in which they avoided the death of Aaron Hernandez, a
famous American-Football player, for example, to try and minimise the
variables, but still; can a study be considered accurate using such
uncontrolled methodology? There are a lot of interesting ‘TOK concepts’ that
this real life situation raises, and is a good one for ‘exploring the TOK world.’
No comments:
Post a Comment